In
October 1863, in the aftermath of staggering losses at Gettysburg and
Vicksburg, Brigadier General E. W. Gantt, once commander of a secessionist
regiment he raised himself, told a group of Union sympathizers in Little Rock,
AK, that his former brothers-in-arms should lay down their guns because the
Confederate cause was lost.
This
repentance proved singular at the time and as one might expect, there was wide
speculation about his motives. To most northern Unionists he was a southerner
caught up in the passions of 1860 and 1861 who had, through experience and
considered reflection, come to his senses. Fellow Confederates dared not think
he could be right about slavery or the rapidly diminishing chances for southern
independence so they pointed to his troubled past with the Confederate
hierarchy and accused him of only scurrilous motives.
Gantt’s
evolution from Rebel general to Republican celebrity and Confederate pariah remains
a unique path, although it began in a typical way. Like
many young men on the make in the first half of the 19th century, Gantt
migrated west, from Tennessee to western Arkansas where he began his subsequent
rise as a lawyer and politician. In the six years prior to secession Gantt had
been the prosecutor for Hempstead County with its county seat of Washington,
Arkansas. He owned a few slaves and had a prosperous legal practice. In 1860,
however, his prospects were buoyed when he joined with a group of politicians
challenging the prevailing machine of Arkansas Democratic politics known as “The
Family.” Gantt ran for the party nomination to the House of Representatives for
the 2nd District of Arkansas and won election to the U.S. Congress.
Like most of the Arkansas delegation in 1861, though, he chose not to take his
seat.
Gantt
encouraged, and even helped lead, his fellow Arkansans to secede. He raised a
regiment of infantry, became its colonel despite his relative youth at age 32,
and saw battle in Missouri and Tennessee. As Union troops advanced he found
himself in command of an ad hoc brigade with a field promotion to Acting
Brigadier General on Island No. 10 in the Mississippi, cut off from other
Confederate support. Thanks to innovative maneuvers by Union forces in that
corner of Missouri, Confederate regiments including Gantt’s were captured
without exacting any toll upon the U. S. In keeping with the ideals of honor
and leadership of the day, Gantt turned down a chance for personal escape and
surrendered with most of his troops. He endured several months of confinement
in Fort Warren prison at Boston before being exchanged in August, 1862.
When
Gantt returned home, he hoped to be returned to command and he actively sought
a new regiment. For reasons that remain unclear, the Confederate War Department
did not see fit to give him a second regiment. Either because of the debacle at
Island No. 10 or due to the political divisions with the Confederate military
and government (Gantt’s patrons, such as P.G.T. Beauregard, did not enjoy favor
with the Richmond leaders), he was passed over.
Then,
unexpectedly, on June 3 of 1863 Gantt surrendered himself to General Ulysses S.
Grant at the Union lines besieging the garrison at Vicksburg, Mississippi. He
is believed to have been the highest-ranking Confederate officer to change
sides during the Civil War. Union authorities whisked him to Memphis and
debriefed him on CSA defenses. Later that
summer he traveled to Washington, where he met President Lincoln. By the time he
returned to the Mississippi Valley, Union forces had taken control of Little
Rock and the state’s Confederate government had fled to Gantt’s hometown of
Washington. As part of his efforts to hasten reconciliation between confederate
Arkansans and the Union, he gave his rousing speech at Little Rock on October 7,
1863. It is not clear whether the speech
persuaded any Arkansans to revert to the Union, but the speech made Gantt
momentarily famous and helped earn him a full pardon for treason from President
Lincoln in December, 1863.
Gantt’s
speech runs 9,300 words in length. While other native southerners became renowned
for advocating the Union, such as Parson Brownlow of Tennessee or Arkansas’s
own Unionist Isaac Murphy, Gantt is a much rarer figure: a secessionist and
Confederate combat veteran who changed his allegiance back to the Union. Early
in the speech Gantt related his secessionist and Confederate credentials. He
identified with his audience of seceded southerners. Then he decried the loss
of freedom under the Confederate government, denounced southern leaders, and
proclaimed slavery a dead institution. In fact, Gantt’s view of the history of
slavery and its centrality as a cause for secession sound like they could have
been written by a historian a century later. He exclaimed: “I thought that the Government was
divided, and Negro slavery established forever. I erred. The Government was
stronger than slavery. Re-union is certain, but not more certain than the
downfall of slavery.” If that is not clear enough he put it more plainly later,
“We fought for Negro slavery. We have lost.”
Gantt obviously harbored an enmity
toward some state-level Confederate leaders and Jefferson Davis, exclaiming
that, “After nearly two years of strife, we awaken, from a fearful baptism of
blood, to the terrible truth that the shadow of the despotism which we fled
from, under Mr. Lincoln, dissolves into nothingness compared to the awful reign
of tyranny that we have groaned under at the hands of Jefferson Davis and his
minions.” But if his plea identified enemies of the people, it also offered
heroes, such as Arkansan Augustus Garland and even some CSA military figures
such as Joe Johnston, both of whom has served with integrity and intelligence
in Gantt’s estimation. He also pointed the way forward by endorsing Lincoln’s lenient
plan for Reconstruction. Rhetorically, his oration was leavened with heroes,
villains and the great mass of men caught between them.
Gantt attempted to persuade those
still adhering to secession and hope in Confederate military success to give
those ideas up as vain. He said this several times and in different turns of
phrase throughout his address. Neither
guerilla warfare nor regular armies would save the South now, he said, for “we
are whipped — fairly beaten.” To fail to see the certainty of that defeat only
made things worse as “anguish and sorrow and desolation meet us wherever we
turn. The longer the struggle the more of it.” At the concluding portion of the
speech, he offered a straight-forward appeal: “The sooner we lay down our arms
and quit this hopeless struggle, the sooner our days of prosperity will
return.”
Gantt’s
speech appeared in both newspapers and pamphlets. The first pamphlet appeared
in print in October of 1863 and its distribution led to widespread dissemination
of his message. A copy of it remains in Abraham Lincoln’s papers at the Library
of Congress. Newspaper reports of the speech ranged from Arkansas, to
Pennsylvania, Iowa and Wisconsin. At least 26 different newspapers, including
the New York Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, the New York Herald and the Liberator attended to the Gantt story. The headlines of the reprints are revealing
as they indicate the media frame of his speech. The Philadelphia Inquirer dubbed it “A Repentant Rebel’s Appeal to the
South.” The New York Times called it a “Curious Document” and published
extensive verbatim passages from the pamphlet. The Cleveland Daily Herald named it a “Significant Document.” The Journal American of Huntingdon,
Pennsylvania dubbed it “A Cheering Sign.”
By early
1864 it is fair to say that Gantt had achieved genuine fame in the Union as the repentant secessionist. The unexpected
notoriety resulting from his first address led to many speeches and to a second
meeting with President Lincoln in Washington to discuss re-organizing and
restoring Arkansas to the Union. In his speeches he spoke to throngs in New
York, New Hampshire, and Ohio and addressed the Pennsylvania legislature. His
lectures and even arrivals in cities were treated as front-page news. He used
his pulpit to further Lincoln’s forgiving approach to Reconstruction, to call
southerners back to the Union, to denounce Copperheads, and to support the
Lincoln administration’s prosecution of the war. The 1864 election was a major
contextual feature to Gantt’s speeches even though Lincoln’s Democratic
opponent was months away from being nominated at the time. While Gantt used his
oratorical skills, which were considerable, to support Lincoln, his own agenda
was to promote a speedy end to the war and the rapid reincorporation of
Arkansas and the southern states into the Union. In this regard Gantt remained
on message in public from that fateful October speech through the end of the
war.
Further
evidence of Gantt’s change of heart came in 1865 when he became the first
supervisor for the Southwest Arkansas District of the Freedmen’s Bureau, based
in his hometown of Washington. As a one-time small slaveholder (he owned six
slaves in 1860) Gantt now worked hard to see that former slaves received
impartial treatment in economic and civil life. He constantly prodded his staff
of Bureau agents to attend to their duties and to defuse volatile situations
between Freedmen and area whites. At the conclusion of a year’s service to the
Freedmen’s Bureau, Gantt relocated to Little Rock, where he practiced law,
supported Republican politics and was elected county prosecutor in 1868. His
fame (or ignominy, to many former Confederates) led him to be cautious lest he
become a victim of the violence rampant during Reconstruction. Even so, he
suffered a severe physical beating at the hands of political enemies on the
streets of Little Rock in the early 1870s.
Gantt’s
legal career reached its apogee just before his death in 1874, when he
successfully fulfilled a commission from the state legislature to publish the
first digest of laws for Arkansas. His completion of this daunting work of
legal scholarship shows the esteem he enjoyed among Reconstruction legislators.
Gantt’s Digest served the bar of
Arkansas for more than a generation.
Then and now, the question of
motive persists. Why would an ardent secessionist and brother in arms such as
Gantt turn traitor? At the time people presumed to understand his motives very
well. To Confederates he was either “insane,” an alcoholic, or doing it for
money. Still others believed disappointment in
his advancement within the Confederate States Army lay at the root of his
decision. T. B. Hanly, a member of the Confederate House of Representatives,
expressed that view to a colleague writing “he applied for the appointment of
Brig. Genl. But it was no go. His conduct now must be prompted by a feeling of
resentment.”
Not all northern opinion viewed
Gantt’s change of heart charitably, either. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, a Democratic paper, opined that they would
not accept Gantt’s opinion on his fellow Arkansans. They required instead “a
better authority than the man who, after betraying his own country now betrays
his traitorous companions.”
Although others ascribed single
motives to Gantt’s change of sides, today’s readers might assume that his
motives were mixed and that his own words reflected at least some of his
reasons. There is reason to think that his stymied military career played a
role. However, Gantt made a largely accurate case that the South was buckling
under the strain of war, governmental weakness, and overwhelming Union
advantages. As a result, he, a once ardent
secessionist, slaveholder, and Confederate officer, had changed his stance on
Lincoln, the Confederacy, Secession, and abolition. It is unsurprising that
former friends wanted rough justice for him. It is no less surprising that
Union loyalists could be so welcoming. It gave emotional succor to the fatigued
and worried Union supporters. They hoped
that in Gantt they were seeing the first in an avalanche of repentant
southerners. It is enormously appealing, after all, for our enemies or opponents
to come to us and say: “You were right and I was wrong.”
Sources: E. W. Gantt,
"Address of Brigadier General E. W. Gantt, C.S.A.," (Little Rock, AR,
1863);Randy Finley, ""This Dreadful Whirlpool" of Civil War:
Edward W. Gantt and The Quest for Distinction," in The Southern Elite and
Social Change, ed. Randy Finley and Thomas A. DeBlack (Fayetteville: Univeristy
of Arkansas Press, 2002; Edward W. Gantt, A Digest of the Statues of Arkansas
Embracing All Laws of General and Permanent Character (Little Rock, 1874);
Willard E. Wight, “The Letters of Thomas B. Hanly, Arkansas Hisotircal Quarterly
(15, 1956) 161-171; Official Records of the War of the Rebellion. Abraham
Lincoln Papers, Library of Congress.
James Tuten
No comments:
Post a Comment